Home | Audio Ministry | Important Books | Broadcast Library | Online Books | Store

Yesterday, Today & Forever

Printable version.

Chapter 6
Israel’s Scriptural Identity: National Aspects, Pt. 2

Available for a suggested donation of $14.00.

Israel to Be a Blessing to All Nations of the Earth

I [YHWH] will make you [Abram] a great nation, and I will bless you, and make your name great; and so you shall be a blessing; and I will bless those who bless you, and the one who curses you I will curse. And in you [Abram and your descendants through Isaac and Jacob/Israel] all the families [other nations and races] of the earth shall be blessed. (Genesis 12:2-3)

... Abraham will surely become a great and mighty nation, and in him [Abraham and his descendants through Isaac and Jacob/Israel] all the nations of the earth will be blessed. (Genesis 18:18)

... in your seed [Abraham's descendants through Isaac and Jacob/Israel] all the nations of the earth shall be blessed, because you have obeyed My voice. (Genesis 22:18)

Your [Jacob/Israel's] descendants shall also be like the dust of the earth, and you shall spread out to the west and to the east and to the north and to the south; and in you [Jacob/Israel] and in your descendants [the Israelites] shall all the families [other nations and races] of the earth be blessed. (Genesis 28:14)

Which People Have Been a Blessing to the Rest of the World


Yeshua (Jesus’ given Hebrew name) the Christ, who descended through the lineage of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, is Israel's foremost blessing to the world:

... I (the Apostle Paul] could wish that I myself were accursed, separated from [the] Christ for the sake of my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh, who are Israelites, to whom belongs the adoption as sons and the glory and the covenants and the giving of the Law and the temple service and the promises, whose are the fathers [Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel], and from whom is the Christ according to the flesh, who is over all, God blessed forever. Amen. (Romans 9:3-5)

It is an irrefutable historical fact that the Celto-Saxons have been the people responsible for taking the gospel of Yeshua to the rest of the world. In addition, the Celto-Saxon peoples with their art, technology, innumerable inventions, commerce, superior agricultural know-how and massive acts of benevolence have been and continue to be the modern-day fulfillment of these prophecies. Who rushes in to help earthquake victims? Who rushes in to help with any disaster? Who sends the Peace Corps to train the rest of the world the proper life-saving techniques of medicine and sanitation? God has richly blessed America, and Americans have prolifically blessed the rest of the world.

It was God's purpose and plan that the Celto-Saxon peoples would be set apart in this special way. Some people may assume that Celto-Saxon America's greatness is due to her own intellect or abilities, but God warns against such vain, haughty thinking:

... you may say in your heart, "My power and the strength of my hand made me this wealth. "But you shall remember YHWH your God, for it is He who is giving you power to make wealth.... (Deuteronomy 8:17-18)

God blesses us, that all the ends of the earth may fear Him. (Psalm 67:7)

Consequently, we have nothing to boast of except God. The following quotations reveal the abundant advantages the Celto-Saxons were blessed with by God, that in turn they might bless the rest of the world. The following men recognized an inherent difference in the Celto-Saxon peoples, and were not blinded by the "politically correct" confusion of our day. Be honest, and you will recognize the truth of their findings, and you will acknowledge that the attributes of the Celto-Saxons are from the benevolence of God and are not of our own making. This acknowledgment allows no room for boasting in ourselves, but requires humble thankfulness for God's gracious gifts.

In The Natural History of the Human Species, Lt. Col. Charles Hamilton Smith wrote the following regarding Caucasian intellect:

The moral and intellectual character we find to be in unison with his structure: the reasoning powers outstripping the mere process of comparing sensations, and showing, in volition [decision making], more elevated thought, more reasoning, justice, and humanity: he [the Caucasian Celto-Saxon] alone of the races of mankind has produced examples of free and popular institutions, and his physical characteristics have maintained them in social life. By means of his logical intellect, he has arrived at ideas requisite for the acquisition of abstract truths; resorting to actual experiment, he fixed bases whereon to build demonstrable inferences, when the positive facts are not otherwise shown; he invented simple arbitrary characters to represent words and musical sounds, and a few signs which, nevertheless, denote, in their relative positions, all possible combinations of numbers and quantity; he has measured time and distance, making the sidereal bodies [stars or constellations) unerring guides to mark locality and give nautical direction; he has ascended to the skies, descended into the deep, and mastered the powers of lightning. By mechanical researches ... [the Caucasian Celto-Saxon] has assuaged human toil, multiplied the results of industry, and created a velocity of locomotion superior to the flight of birds. By his chemical discoveries he has modified bodily pain, and produced numberless discoveries useful in medicine, in arts and manufactures. He has found a sound and connected system of the sciences in general, and acquired a critical literature, while, for more than three thousand years, he [the Caucasian Celto-Saxon] has been the principal possessor of all human knowledge, and the assertor of fixed laws.1

Mr. Smith wrote the foregoing quote in 1851; at that date half the story had not been told. He contrasted the accomplishments of the Negroid race, while elaborating on Celto-Saxon achievements:

... in apathy, the typical woolly-haired races have never invented a reasoned theological system, discovered an alphabet, framed a grammatical language, nor made the least step in science or art. They have scarcely comprehended what they have learned, or retained a civilization taught them by contact with more refined [Celto-Saxon] nations, so soon as that contact has ceased. They have at no time formed great political states, nor commenced a self-evolving civilization.... Even Christianity, of more than three centuries' duration, in Congo [Africa], has scarcely excited a progressive civilization [among the Negroid peoples] .... 2

The preceding and following quotations are not submitted to denigrate the other races, but rather to simply provide anthropological and historical comparisons. While it may not be "politically correct" to do so, the comparison is propitious and necessary in our pursuit to determine the true identity of the Israelites today.

In the introduction to The Natural History of the Human Species, Samuel Kneeland, Jr. provided the following comparisons:

The Caucasian [Celto-Saxon] variety ... is so named, from Mt. Caucasus ... those races in which intellect, both native and cultivated, has produced the mightiest results; those races, whose history would be the history of civilization and of Christianity .... 3

The physical differences among men are as great as usually form specific differences in animals. In the Caucasian [Celto-Saxon] nations, generally, we see the rights of woman acknowledged and established; enlightened governments, just laws, a rational system of religion, commerce, agriculture, art and science in the highest known perfection. In the Mongolian races, woman is a slave, an article of merchandise, government despotic, religion idolatrous, laws unjust and bloody, commerce, agriculture, in a low state; all the arts of life little advanced, and stationary for ages. In the American races [native Indians], the state of things is worse still; and in the African [Negroid races], at the lowest point.4

History need not be very deeply consulted to convince one that the white [Caucasian Celto-Saxon] races, without an exception, have attained a considerable degree of civilization and refinement; and that the dark races have always stopped short at a considerably lower level.... Why have accidental circumstances always prevented the latter from rising, while they have only stimulated the former to higher attainment? The whole mass of facts leads to the conclusion that the dark races are inferiority organized, and cannot to the same extent as the white [Caucasian Celto-Saxon] races, understand the laws of Nature, and therefrom obtain an ever-increasing light and knowledge; that they bear the stamp of their inferiority in their physical organization. The North American Indian bears a stamp of inferiority in his physical and mental constitution ... he is the man of the forest, somber and sad. The results of the mixture of the White and Red races for two hundred years are well known. The [native North American] Indian civilization has not advanced permanently, or of itself, they will not give up their wild life for the restraints of civilization; they cannot, from their organization, be civilized.... Similar reflections arise in contemplating the Negro races. Amalgamation of races will not mend the matter. The inferior race will gain, for a time, what the superior loses; but return to one of the original types, or degeneration and final extinction, must sooner or later be the result.5

Physical geography also teaches, what history confirms, that the three great northern continents are peculiarly organized for the full development of man; they may be styled the historic continents, each having a special function in his education, and corresponding to the periods of his progress. Of the white [Caucasian Celto-Saxon] race, the most perfect type of humanity.

Western Asia may be called the cradle, both physically and morally; the dwelling-place of the chosen people [true descendants of Israel], from whom Christianity was to spread over the earth. Europe "is the school where his youth was trained, where he waxed in strength and knowledge, and grew to a man." "America is the theatre of his activity during manhood; the land where he applies and practices all he has learned, and brings into action all the forces he has acquired."6

In the section entitled "Book of Races and Peoples," from The Circle of Knowledge, we find the following comments concerning some of the blessings bestowed upon Celto-Saxondom and their subsequent influence upon history and society:

The leading part in the history of the world has been, and is still, played by the Aryan nations. The Caucasian presents us with the highest type among the five families of man; the Aryan [Celto-Saxon] branch of the Caucasian family presents us with the noblest pattern of that highest type.

...it is the Aryans [Celto-Saxons] ... that have reached the highest point of intellectual development, as shown in their political freedom, and in their science, literature, and art.7

The noted historian Arnold Joseph Toynbee also pointed to the creative achievements of the English-speaking Celto-Saxon peoples:

However it may have happened, the English-speaking [Celto-Saxon] peoples have become ... the Heirs of the Kingdom, the depositories of the hopes and capacities of Mankind, the chosen vessels through whose instrumentality the Human Race is destined to attain to the goal of its endeavours.8

Mr. Toynbee enumerated twenty-one civilizations and revealed that most of them were created by the white Celto-Saxon race. He also made it clear that he was taking into account only "active, creative contributions."9 In Volume 8 of his work A Study in History Mr. Toynbee specifically identified the benefactors of mankind:

... the Modern Western Protestant Christian [Celto-Saxon] pioneers ... created the United States, Canada, South Africa, Australia, and New Zealand ....10

Today these historically accurate truths will not be found in any classroom even though these observations are verified by anthropologists and historians alike. These truths have been removed from our halls of instruction by those who desire to destroy our culture and civilization. The findings of these scholars are verified in the writings of the following men who were cognizant of the Celto-Saxon racial advantages, and who desired to provide historical documents for instruction in the decades to come.

In A History of the World, French historian and educator, Victor Duruy, commented that the white race was the greatest civilizer:

The White [Celto-Saxon] Race ... has accomplished the greatest work of civilization.11

French ethnologist and diplomat Arthur de Gobineau, in his book The Moral and Intellectual Diversity of Races, also remarked on the civilization that the Celto-Saxons have brought to the other races of the world:

... the theory gains ground... "all branches of the human family are endowed with intellectual capacities of the same nature, which, though in different stages of development, are all equally susceptible of improvement." This is not, perhaps, the precise language, but certainly the meaning....the Huron [a native American Indian tribe], by proper culture, might become the equal of the [Celto-Saxon] Englishman and Frenchman. Why, then, I would ask, did he [the Huron or any other native American Indian tribe] never, in the course of centuries, invent the art of printing or apply the power of steam; why, among the warriors of his tribe, has there never arisen a Caesar or a Charlemagne, among his bards and medicinemen, a Homer or a Hippocrates?12

By this reasoning, I am forced to consider as truly civilized, in the past as well as the present, none but the single English [Celto-Saxon] nation.13

...we shall find that every civilization owes its origin, its development, its splendors, to the agency of the white [Celto-Saxon] races.... Everywhere the white races have taken the initiative, everywhere they have brought civilization to the others....

The migrations of the white [Celto-Saxon] race, therefore, afford us at once a guide for our historical researches, and a clue to many apparently inexplicable mysteries....14

In the introduction of the same book anthropologist H. Hotz came to the same conclusion about the advancement of civilization by the Caucasian race in contrast to the other races:

The testimony of history, and the results of philanthropic experiment, are the data upon which the ethnologist must institute his inquiries, if he would arrive at conclusions instructive to humanity.

Let us take for illustration the white and the black races, supposed by many to represent the two extremes of the scale of gradation. The whole history of the former [the white Celto-Saxon race] shows an uninterrupted progress; that of the latter, monotonous stagnation. To the one [race], mankind owes the most valuable discoveries in the domain of thought, and their practical application; to the other, it owes nothing. For ages plunged in the darkest gloom of barbarism, there is not one ray of even temporary or borrowed improvement to cheer the dismal picture of its history, or inspire with hope the disheartened philanthropist. At the boundary of its territory, the ever-encroaching spirit of conquest of the [Celto-Saxon] European stops powerless. Never in the history of the world, has a grander or more conclusive experiment been tried than in the case of the Negro race. We behold them placed in immediate possession of the richest island in the richest part of the globe, with every advantage that climate, soil, geographical situation can afford; removed from every injurious contact, yet with every facility for constant intercourse with the most polished nations of the earth; inheriting all that the white race had gained by the toil of centuries in science, politics, and 'Morals; and what is the result?'15

... we assert upon the testimony of history, that the white [Celto-Saxon] races are superior [for God's purpose of being a blessing] to the yellow [races]; and these, in turn, to the black [races].16

James Henry Breasted, an American Egyptologist and Orientalist, in The Conquest of Civilization further contrasted the civilizing achievements of the Caucasian race with those of other races:

The evolution of civilization has been the achievement of this Great White [Celto-Saxon] Race.17

The ... negroid peoples remained without any influence on the development of early civilization. We may then exclude both of these external races - the straight-haired, round-headed, yellow-skinned Mongoloids on the east, and the wooly-haired, long-headed, darkskinned Negroids on the south - from any share in the origins or subsequent development of civilization.18

[The Chinese] cultures received a great impetus from the west, and their art was transformed as a result of contact with Hellenistic civilization brought in by Alexander the Great in the fourth century, B.C. Vastly earlier, Chinese civilization must have received its material basis in agriculture and cattle breeding from western sources, for it cannot be an accident that the cultures of Western Asia and China were built up on the same economic foundation of herds and grain fields.19

Early American preachers and patriots recognized the providence of God in the Celto-Saxon peoples long before the historians and anthropologists acknowledged it. These men of God were honest and bold enough to speak out on this evident truth, whereas their modern-day counterparts tremble at doing the same. Pastor Ezra Stiles looked into the future and foresaw the great blessings which American Celto-Saxons would bestow upon the rest of the world:

... who can tell how extensive a blessing this American Joseph may become to the whole human race, although once despised by his brethren, exiled, and sold into Egypt? How applicable that in Genesis xlix; 22, 26 [Gen. 49:22-26]: "Joseph is a fruitful bough, even a fruitful bough by a well; whose branches run over the wall. The archers have sorely grieved him, and shot at him, and hated him. But his bow abode in strength; the arms of his hands were made strong by the arms of the mighty God of Jacob. The blessings of thy [Joseph's] father [Jacob/Israel] have prevailed above the blessings of my progenitors [Abraham and Isaac], unto the utmost bound of the everlasting hill...."

Little would civilians have thought ages ago that the world should ever look to [Celto-Saxon] America for models of [civil] government and polity ....20

Pastor Josiah Strong described the English and American Celto-Saxon as "his brother's keeper":

... it is chiefly to the English and American [Celto-Saxon] peoples that we must look for the evangelization of the world.

It is not necessary to argue to those for whom I write that the two great needs of mankind, that all men may be lifted up into the light of the highest Christian civilization, are, first, a pure, spiritual Christianity, and, second, civil liberty. Without controversy, these are the forces which, in the past, have contributed most to the elevation of the human race, and they must continue to be, in the future, the most efficient ministers to its progress. It follows, then that the Anglo-Saxon, as the great representative of these two ideas, the depositary of these two greatest blessings, sustains peculiar relations to the world's future, is divinely commissioned to be, in a peculiar sense, his brother's keeper.21

In a speech before the House of Representatives on January 19, 1824, Daniel Webster declared what was obvious to the world concerning the Celto-Saxon race at that time:

Human liberty may yet, perhaps, be obliged to repose its principal hopes on the intelligence and the vigor of the Saxon race.22

In his two-volume epic Democracy in America, first published in France in 1835, the world-renowned historian, Alexis de Tocqueville, expressed very similar sentiments. Keep in mind that it was neither as an American nor as an Englishman, but as a Frenchman that Mr. de Tocqueville made his observations:

The Anglo-American[s] ... are not very remote from believing themselves to belong to a distinct race of mankind.23

... I am of opinion that the true cause of their [American Celto-Saxons'] superiority must not be sought for in physical advantages, but that it is wholly attributable to their moral and intellectual qualities derived from their relationship with God Almighty].24

The [Celto-Saxon] Americans of the United States already exercise a very considerable moral influence upon all the peoples of the New World. They are the source of intelligence, and all the nations which inhabit the same continent are already accustomed to consider them as the most enlightened, the most powerful, and the most wealthy members of the great American family. All eyes are therefore turned towards the Union; and the States of which the other communities try to imitate to the best of their power; it is from the United States that they borrow their political principles and their laws.

The [Celto-Saxon] Americans of the United States stand in precisely the same position with regard to the peoples of South America as their fathers, the English, occupy with regard to the Italians, the Spaniards, the Portuguese, and all those nations of Europe which receive their articles of daily consumption from England, because they are less advanced in civilization and trade. England is at this time the natural emporium of almost all the nations which are within its reach; the American Union will perform the same part in the other hemisphere .... 25

In an editorial entitled "Americans" on radio station CFRB, Toronto, Canada, on June 5, 1973, Gordon Sinclair attested to the fact that Americans are usually in the forefront when it comes to benevolence:

... this Canadian thinks it is time to speak up for the Americans as the most generous and possibly the least appreciated people in all the earth.

As long as sixty years ago, when I first started to read newspapers, I read of floods on the Yellow River and the Yangtze [in China]. Who rushed in with men and money to help? The Americans did. They have helped control floods on the Nile [in Egypt], the Amazon [in South America], the Ganges [in India] and the Niger [in Africa].

Today [1973] the rich bottomland of the Mississippi is under water and no foreign land has sent a dollar to help.

Germany, Japan, and to a lesser extent Britain and Italy, were lifted out of the debris of war by the Americans who poured in billions of dollars and forgave other billions in debts. None of these countries is today paying even the interest on its remaining debts to the United States. When the franc was in danger of collapsing in 1956, it was the Americans who propped it up and their reward was to be insulted and swindled on the streets of Paris. I was there. I saw it.

When distant cities are hit by earthquake it is the United States that hurries in to help ... Managua, Nicaragua, is one of the most recent examples. So far this spring, fifty-nine American communities have been flattened by tornadoes. Nobody has helped.

The Marshall Plan, the Truman Policy, all pumped billions upon billions of dollars [from America] into discouraged countries. Now newspapers in those countries are writing about the decadent war-mongering Americans.

I'd like to see just one of those countries that is gloating over the erosion of the United States dollar build its own airplanes. Come on, let's hear it. Does any other country in the world have a plane to equal the Boeing Jumbo Jet, the Lockheed Tristar or the Douglas 10? If so, why don't they fly them? Why do all international lines except Russia fly American planes? Why does no other land on earth even consider putting a man or woman on the moon?...

I can name you 5,000 times when the Americans raced to the help of other people in trouble. Can you name me even one time when someone else raced to the Americans in trouble? I don't think there was outside help even during the San Francisco earthquake....

Most anyone can add much to the list of blessings which have come to all nations through America. The feeding of hungry people from Belgium to Armenia after World War I, Bundles for Britain during World War II, and the continuing foreign aid programs around the world since then. The "Care" packages, Children's Fund, and many other programs in addition to the projects financed by the United States government. Yes, Jehovah [YHWH] was surely speaking of America when He said to Abraham, "In thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed."

In his book Warning to the West, Aleksandr Isayevich Solzhenitsyn echoed the same sentiments:

The United States has long shown itself to be the most magnanimous, the most generous country in the world. Wherever there is a flood, an earthquake, a fire, a natural disaster, an epidemic, who is the first to help? The United States. Who helps the most and unselfishly? The United States.

And what do we hear in reply? Reproaches, curses, "Yankee Go Home." American cultural centers are burned, and representatives from the Third World jump on the tables to vote against the United States at the U.N.26

Another honest author, Wilmot Robertson, also brought attention to Celto-Saxon philanthropy:

The successful can afford to share their success, and the [Celto-Saxon] Majority did so with indiscriminate prodigality [reckless extravagance]. With no qualifications or conditions, the laboriously accumulated privileges of Majority institutions were distributed gratis [free without charge] to members of other races and cultures who accepted them almost as a matter of course, often with a show of ingratitude, and then used them for entirely different purposes than they were originally intended.27

The following news article also testifies to America's generosity:

The Orlando Sentinel, Saturday, July 19, 1986

Religion gifts beat inflation by 2-to-1 ratio


NEW YORK-Americans giving to religious causes last year rose 6.5 percent, or nearly twice the inflation rate, to $37.7 billion.

But giving to other philanthropic causes increased even more.

The figures were part of the annual "Giving USA" report, compiled by the American Association of Fund-Raising Counsel.

"The spirit of giving is alive and well and comes across loud and clear," says association chairman Robert L. Thompson,

"It is one of the remarkable characteristicstics that sets this country apart from every other country in the world.

The report estimates Americans contributed $79,84 billion to philanthropic causes in 1985, up 8.9 percent from the year, before, far outdistancing the annual 3.7 percent inflation.

It is important to remember that in order for us to be a blessing, we must first be blessed. Thomas Jefferson was enthusiastic over the blessings afforded this nation:

My God! how little do my [Celto-Saxon] countrymen know what precious blessings they are in possession of, and which no other people on earth enjoy....28

In an address delivered on Bunker Hill on June 17, 1843, Daniel Webster acknowledged the responsibility which comes with these abundant gifts:

... America has not failed to make returns.... And she admits, that, standing in the midst of civilized nations, and in a civilized age, a nation among nations, there is a high part which she is expected to act, for the general advancement of human interests and human welfare.

American mines have filled the mints of Europe with the precious metals. The productions of the American soil and climate have poured out their abundance of luxuries for the tables of the rich, and of necessaries for the sustenance of the poor. Birds and animals of beauty and value have been added to the European stocks; and transplantations from the unequalled riches of our forest have mingled themselves profusely with the elms, and ashes, and Druidical oaks of England.

America has made contributions to Europe far more important. Who can estimate the amount, or the value, of the augmentation of the commerce of the world that has resulted from America? Who can imagine to himself what would now be the shock to the Eastern Continent, if the Atlantic were no longer traversable, or if there were no longer American productions, or American markets?

... America exercises influences, or holds out examples, for the consideration of the Old World, of a much higher, because they are of a moral and political character..

America [and her Celto-Saxon peoples] has proved that it is practicable to elevate the mass of mankind....

She [America] holds out an example, a thousand times more encouraging than ever was presented before, to th ose nine tenths of the human race who are born without hereditary fortune [Israelite blessings] or hereditary rank [Israelite descendancy].29

Essentially, Mr. Webster was declaring:

...from everyone who has been given much shall much be required; and to whom they entrusted much, of him they will ask all the more. (Luke 12:48)

At this point, someone is possibly objecting: "This is the melting pot of the world; America is made up of people from every race and nation!" Honestly ask yourself: If America was predominantly black, Mexican, Indian, or Oriental, would the same magnanimous giving abound? If race was not a factor, then why have we not seen China, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Central and South America, or Africa jumping in to help those in need? Having been blessed by God, the Celto-Saxons have been, and continue to be, the people who have blessed the rest of the world.


Which nation and its religion has been a curse rather than a blessing to the rest of the world? Consider the ensuing testimonials* from the following prominent people concerning the Jews:


*The numerous quotations provided in the remainder of this chapter may appear to be a departure from the primary intent of this section. However, since some people will consider the following material to be incredible, I have chosen to quote as many sources as are currently available to me.


Emperor Tiberius Caesar, 19 A.D.

... [the Jews] alone of all nations avoided dealings with any other people and looked upon all men as their enemies.30

John the Baptist, 31 A.D.

You [Pharisees and Sadducees] brood of vipers, who warned you to flee from the wrath to come?31

Yeshua the Christ, 33 A.D.

You [Pharisees] brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good?32

"You [Pharisees and scribes] hypocrites, rightly did Isaiah prophesy of you, saying, 'This people honors Me with their lips, but their heart is far away from Me. But in vain do they worship Me, teaching as [Scriptural] doctrines the precepts of men."33

... they [the Pharisees] are blind guides of the blind. And if a blind man guides a blind man, both will fall into a pit.34

Watch out and beware of the leaven [teaching-Judaism - Matt. 16:12] of the Pharisees* and Sadducees.35


Pharisaism was the predecessor of modern-day Talmudic Judaism as demonstrated in chapter 8 -"Israel's Scriptural Identity."


The scribes and the Pharisees have seated themselves in the chair of Moses; therefore all that they tell you [regarding Mosaic Law], do and observe, but do not do according to their [Judaistic] deeds; for they say things, and do not do them. And they tie up heavy loads, and lay them on men's shoulders; but they themselves are unwilling to move them with so much as a finger. But they do all their deeds to be noticed by men; for they broaden their phylacteries, and lengthen the tassels of their garments. And they love the place of honor at banquets, and the chief seats in the synagogues, and respectful greetings in the market places, and being called by men, Rabbi."36

... woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites, because you shut off the kingdom of heaven from men; for you do not enter in yourselves, nor do you allow those who are entering to go in. Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites, because you travel about on sea and land to make one proselyte; and when he becomes one, you make him twice as much a son of hell as yourselves. Woe to you, blind guides.... You fools and blind men.... You blind men ....37

Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you tithe mint and dill and cumin, and have neglected the weightier provisions of the [Mosaic] law: justice and mercy and faithfulness; but these are the things you should have done without neglecting the others. You blind guides, who strain out a gnat and swallow a camel!

Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees - hypocrites! For you clean the outside of the cup and of the dish, but inside they are full of robbery and self-indulgence. You blind Pharisee, first clean the inside of the cup and of the dish, so that the outside of it may become clean also. Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you are like whitewashed tombs which on the outside appear beautiful, but inside they are full of dead men's bones and all uncleanness. Even so you too outwardly appear righteous to men, but inwardly you are full of hypocrisy and lawlessness. Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you build the tombs of the prophets and adorn the monuments of the righteous .... 38

You [scribes and Pharisees] serpents, you brood of vipers, how shall you escape the sentence of hell? ... I am sending you prophets and wise men and scribes; some of them you will kill and crucify, and some of them you will scourge in your synagogues, and persecute from city to city ....39

YouU [Jews] are of your father the devil, and you want to do the desires of your father. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. Whenever he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own nature; for he is a liar, and the father of lies.40

I [Yeshua] know ... the blasphemy by those who say they are Jews [Judahites] and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.41

... I [Yeshua] will cause those of the synagogue of Satan, who say that they are Jews, and are not, but lie ... I will make them to come and bow down at your [Christian Israelites'] feet, and to know that I have loved you.42

Justin the Martyr,* 116


*"The Church Fathers engaged in frequent polemic [aggressive refutation] against Judaism. One of the oldest patristic [Church Fathers] documents is Justin Martyr's Dialogue with the Jew Trypho (2nd cent.)." "CHURCH FATHERS," The New Stands, Jewish Encyclopedia (Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company, 1977) pp. 439-440.


... ye [Jews] should be separated from the other nations and US....43

For ye slew the Just One and His prophets before Him, and now ye reject, and, as far as in you lies dishonour that set their hope on Him, and God Almighty and Maker of the universe who sent Him, cursing in your synogouges them that believe on Christ. For you have not authority to raise your own hands against us, because of them that are now supreme. But as often as ye could, this also ye did.44

For the other nations are not guilty of this injustice against us and the Christ in the same way as ye are. For you are the cause that even they are so prejudiced against the Righteous One, and against us who are His... So that ye not only are the cause of iniquity for yourelves, but in fact for all others45

But, as for you, you have never shown yourselves as possessing friendship or love, either towards God, or towards the prophets, or towards one another, but aS is plain, are found to be always idolators and murderers of the righteous, so that you even laid hands upon Christ Himself, and still stay in your wickedness, cursing even them who prove tht He who was crucified by you is the Christ.46

For you curse in your synogogues all who become Christians through Him.47

Saint Chrysostom, A.D. 407

Our sheep are surrounded by Jewish wolves.

Their synogogues may be likened to playhouses, their dens of brigands, the abode of Satan [See Rev. 2:9 and 3:9].

Therefore, they must be mistrusted; the Jewish disease must be guarded against.

Thieves, impure, debauchers, rapcious, misers, crafty, oppressors of the poor; they [Jews] have filled the mesure of their crimes by immolating [destroying] Jesus.48

Jerome (Hieronymus),420

An impure spirit has seized the Jews.49

Pope Gelasius 1, 492-496

The whole is often named from the part ... Judas, concerning whom it was said: 'One of you is a devil' for he was the devil's workman, without any doubt gives his name to all the [Jewish] race.50

Mohammed, 570

It is incomprehensible to me, why one has not long ago expelled these death-breathing beasts ... are these Jews anything else but devourers of men?51

Seventeenth Council of Toledo, Spain, 694

... the impious Jews dwelling within the frontiers of our Kingdom ... have entered into a plot ... in order that they might act as one against the Christian race ... through their crimes, they [the Jews] would not only throw the [Christian] Church into confusion but, indeed, by their attempted tyranny, have essayed to bring ruin to the Fatherland [Spain] and to all the population.52

Pope Gregory VII (Hildebrand), 1078

We admonish Your Highness [King Alphonso VI] that you must cease to suffer the Jews to rule over the Christians and exercise authority over them. For to allow the Christians to be subordinated to the Jews, and to subject them to their judgment, is the same as oppressing God's Church and exalting Satan's synagogue. To wish to please Christ's enemies means to treat Christ himself with contumely [contempt - 2 Chron. 19:21].53

Peter the Venerable, Abbot of Cluny, circa 1130

...evil, blaspheming Jews, far worse than Saracens, not at a distance, but in our midst, so freely and audaciously blaspheme, trample underfoot, deface with impunity Christ and all Christian mysteries.54

Geoffrey Chaucer, 1387

O, you young Hugh of Lincoln [England], slain also by cursed Jews, as is well known to all ....55

Martin Luther, 1543

The sun never did shine on a more bloodthirsty and revengeful people as they [the Jews] who imagine to be the people of God who desire to and think they must murder and crush the heathen.56

... my dear Christian ... next to the Devil you have no more bitter, more poisonous, more vehement an enemy than a real Jew who earnestly desires to be a Jew [a disciple of the Talmud].57

Pope Clement VIII, 1592

All the world suffers from the usury of the Jews, their monopolies and deceit. They have brought many unfortunate people into a state of poverty, especially farmers, working-class people, and the very poor.58

Voltaire (Jean Francois Marie Arouet), 1694

The Jews are nothing but an ignorant and barbaric people, which have for a long time combined the most loathsome avarice with the most abominable superstition* and inextinguishable hatred of all people by whom they are tolerated, and ... enriched.59

I cite that wretched little Jewish people, who should assuredly not serve as a rule for anyone, and who ... was never anything but a race of ignorant and fanatic brigands.60

Pastor Cotton Mather, 1702

... I am not without suspicion, that there may be something further in the conjecture of the learned Bartholinus hereupon, who says, It was ... the Jews, by the frequent use of magical tricks,* called in the devils among them.61


*Probably in reference to the Jewish Cabala. "cabala: 1: A medieval and modern system of Jewish theosophy [subjective insight], mysticism [obscure speculation], and thaumaturgy [magic] marked by belief in creation through emanation [hierarchically descending radiations] and a cipher method [used to conceal the meaning] of interpreting Scripture Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary (Springfield, MA: G. & C. Merriam Company, 1975) p. 153.


Pastor Isaac Watts, 1715

Lord I ascribe it to thy Grace and not to chance as others do that I was born of Christian race and not a heathen or a Jew.62

General George Washington, 1778, 1779

It is much to be lamented, that each State, long err this, has not hunted them [the Jews] down, as pests to society, and the greatest enemies we have to the happiness of America.

This tribe of black gentry [the Jews] work more effectively against us [Christian America], than the enemy's armies. They are a hundred times more dangerous to our [American] liberties and the great cause we are engaged in.

I would to God, that ... the most atrocious [Jew] in each State, was hung upon a gallows, five times as high as the one proposed by Haman [Esther 8].

No punishment... is too great for the man [Jew] who can build his greatness upon his country's ruin.63

Benjamin Franklin, 1789

There is a great danger for the United States of America. That great danger is the Jew. Gentlemen, in whichever land the Jews have settled, they have depressed the moral level and lowered the degree of commercial honesty. They have created a State within a State, and when they are opposed, they attempted to strangle the nation financially, as in the case of Portugal and Spain.

For more than 1700 years they [the Jews] have lamented their sorrowful fate, namely, that they were driven out of the motherland; but gentlemen, if the civilized world today should give them back Palestine as their property, they would immediately find pressing reasons for not returning there. Why? Because they [the Jews] are vampires and cannot live on other vampires. They cannot live on themselves. They must live among Christians and others who do not belong to their race.

If they are not excluded from the United States by the Constitution, within less than a hundred years they will stream into the country in such numbers that they [the Jews] will rule and destroy us, and change our form of government for which Americans have shed their blood and sacrificed life, property, and personal freedom. If the Jews are not excluded, within 200 years our children will be working the fields to feed the Jews, while they remain in the Counting House gleefully rubbing their hands.

I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not exclude the Jew forever [from America], your children and your children's children will curse you in your grave.

Their ideas are not those of Americans. The leopard cannot change his spots. The Jews are a danger to this land, and if they are allowed to enter, they will imperil its institutions.

They [the Jews] should be excluded [from America] by the [U.S.] Constitution!64

Napoleon Bonaparte, circa 1800

I decided to improve the Jews: but I do not want any more of them in my Kingdom: indeed, I have done all to prove my scorn of the vilest nation in the world.65

President Thomas Jefferson, 1803

Their [the Jews'] Ethics [religious practices] were not only imperfect, but often irreconcilable with the sound dictates of reason and [Christian] morality, as they respect intercourse with those around us; and repulsive and anti-social, as respecting other nations. They needed reformation, therefore, in an eminent degree.66

Johann Gottlieb Fichte, 1762-1814

The only way I see by which civil rights can be conceded to them [the Jews] is to cut off all their heads in one night and to set new ones on their shoulders, which should contain not a single Jewish idea. The only means of protecting ourselves against them is to conquer their promised land and send them thither.67

Andrew Jackson, 1767-1845

You [Jews] are a den of vipers [Matt. 23:29-331 and thieves. I have determined to rout you out, and by the Eternal God, I will rout you out.68

Heinrich von Treitschke, 1879

Even in the circles of highest culture, among men who would reject any idea of religious intolerance with horror, one single cry is heard, "The Jews are our misfortune."69

Sir Winston Churchill, 1920

The conflict between good and evil which proceeds unceasingly in the breast of man nowhere reaches such an intensity as in the Jewish race....

This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-[Adam] Weishaupt [Germany] to those of Karl Marx [Germany], and down to [Leon] Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing.... It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary [Jewish] personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed [Communist] master of that enormous empire.70

Henry Ford, Sr., 1922

It is time to show that the cry of 'bigot' is raised mostly by [Jewish] bigots. There is a religious prejudice in this country, there is, indeed, a religious persecution, there is a forcible shoving aside of the religious liberties of a [Christian] majority of the people, and this prejudice and persecution and use of force is JEWISH [Mr. Ford's emphasis] and nothing but JEWISH."71

Is it surprising that whichever way you turn to trace the harmful streams of influence that flow through society, you come upon a group of Jews? In baseball corruption - a group of Jews. In exploitative finance - a group of Jews. In theatrical degeneracy - a group of Jews. In liquor propaganda - a group of Jews. In control of national war policies - a group of Jews. In control of the press through business and financial pressure - a group of Jews.72 War profiteers, 80% of them - Jews. Organizers of active opposition to Christian laws and customs - Jews. In this miasma of so-called popular music, which combines weakmindedness with every suggestion of lewdness again Jews.73

Which people and their religion have been a curse, rather than a blessing, to the rest of the world? Consider the testimony from the many countries throughout history that expelled the Jews. Under the subheading "34 Times When Jews Were Expelled From Their Homes (1000 C.E. - 1900 C.E.*)" in chapter 13 entitled "The Jews as Outcasts," The [1980] Jewish Almanac made this startling admission:


*The Jews do not recognize Yeshua the Christ as "Lord" or that Yahweh was "made flesh and dwelt among us." Consequently, The Jewish Almanac's reference "C.E.," rather than A.D. - anno Domini -"in the year of the Lord," represents the Jews' effort to erase from history our Lord's advent or arrival. C.E. is the abbreviation for "Common Era," a new term, which is used in Jewish writings and is now finding its way into Judeo-Christian writings as well.


History is filled with dozens of peremptory edicts expelling Jews from where they had made their homes. At times the edicts were the result of trumped up charges against the Jews or Judaism, later determined to be false. At other times they were the consequence of an economic situation which the authorities believed would be improved if the Jews were removed.... The following list is far from complete. Hardly a major Jewish community has not been expelled by its "host" country, only to be let back in again and later, [to be] expelled once more.74

The first (1793) edition of The Farmer's Almanac by Robert Bailey Thomas provided the same basic information:


A brief account of the perseciution of the JEWS

THE seventy years captivity of the Jews began in 606 BC before Christ; they about Cyrene, headed by one Andrea, murdered about 10,000 Greeks and Romans, they ate their entrails, and covered themselves with the skins of those they assassinated, 115 after Christ. Above 580,000 destroyed by the Romans 135. First arrived in England, 1079. Thinking to invoke the divine clemency at the solemnization of the Passover, sacrificed a young lad of twelve years old, the son of a rich trade man at Paris, by first whipping his flesh from his bones, and then crucifying him, for which cruelly the criminals were executed, and the rest banished from France, 1180; from this circumstance the Jews have been ever since held in detestation. Massacred, Sept. 3, 1189. Seven were condemned to pay the king 20,000 Marks, or suffer perpetual imprisonment for circumcising a Christian child at Norwhich, and attempting to crucify him, 1235. Two hundred and upwards were apprehended for crucifying a child [Hugh] at Lincoln, eighteen of whom were hanged, and the rest heavily fined, 1255. Seven hundred were slain in London, because a Jew would have forced a Christian to pay him more than two shillings per week for the loan of 20, 1262. Every Jew, who loaned money on usury was forced to wear a plate upon his breast signifying he was a usurer, or to quit the realm, 1274. Two hundred and sixty seven were hanged and quartered for clipping [money], 1277; the same year the Jews crucified a child at Northampton, for which fifty were drawn at horse tails and hanged. All the synagogues were ordered to be destroyed, 1282. All the Jews in England were apprehended in one, their goods and chatells confiscated to the King, and then, to the number 15660, banished the realm, having only sustenance money allowed, 1287; they remained banished 364 years, till Oliver Cromwell restored them. A general massacre of them at Verdun (France) by the Peasants, who, from a pretended prophecy, conceived the Holy Land was to be recovered from the Infidels by them; 500 of these Jews took shelter in a castle and defended themselves to the last extremity, when for want of weapons, they threw their children at the enemy, and then killed each other, 1317. Driven out of France, 1394. Driven out of Spain, to the number of one hundred and fifty thousand, 1492; they retired to Africa, Portugal, and France. It was against them that the Inquisition was first established. There was not a Jew in England from 1610 to 1624. An act was passed to naturalize, 1753; but was repealed on the petition of all the cities in England, 1754. Four were executed in London for murdering a servant, 1771.75

It is politically advantageous for modern-day Jews to use those events from history as examples of "anti-semitism, racism and prejudice." However, in his book Now and Forever, Samuel Roth put those expulsions of his people, the Jews, in a different light:

I call your attention to the fact that there are real reasons why the world dislikes us [Jews] - reasons more imposing than the trifling things used against us.... But there are, as I have already said, good, solid reasons why the world should dislike us, and I, a Jew, will utter them. After all, were we Jews not always the best judges of our own faults? Did we ever shrink from shouting our failings from the house tops? We are today the most bitterly despised people in the world. Never was a people so simply, so tenaciously, so whole-heartedly loathed....

There is not a program, a sentiment or a conviction a European [Celto-Saxon] can choose to follow but he must follow a Jew - whether it be Bergson, Marx or Freud.

Why should not the intelligentsia of Europe hate us? Time and again we [Jews] have humiliated them.76

Mr. Roth expounded on this in detail in his book Jews Must Live:

If it were true, as the Jews claim, that the gentiles [non-Jews] lay violent hands on them purely out of prejudice against their religion, out of envy of their superior commercial genius, how would the Jews ever get into a civilized country to begin with? Have not Jews been admitted from time immemorial, freely, kindly, almost happily by every nation at whose gate they have knocked for admittance? The story of the Jews, as they have themselves written it out, has always gone out ahead of them, to spread through the foreign peoples and evoke in their minds curiosity and pity. Have the Jews ever had to petition a country for admission - the first time?

Read for yourself the story of the progress of Jewry through Europe and America. Wherever they come they are welcomed, permitted to settle down, and join in the general business of the community. But one by one the industries of the country close to them because of unfair practices - until, it being impossible to longer hold in check the wrath of a betrayed people, there is violence, and inevitably, an ignominious ejection of the whole race from the land. There is not a single instance when the Jews have not fully deserved the bitter fruit of the fury of their persecutors....

In England and in France the influence of the Jews in politics, business and the professions has created an atmosphere so stifling to the natives that a whole press has sprung up in those countries whose sole business is advocating another, but this time permanent expulsion of the Jews....

It [expulsion] has become the reasoning of every king and congress of every country invaded by the Jewish People. It has never changed because the nature [morality] of the Jews has undergone no reasonable change.77

If a non-Jew had made these comments he would have been branded as an anti-semite or some other equivalent aspersion. However, the previous words are the words of a Jew.

Ask today's Arabs their opinions regarding today's Jews. The Arabs are being persecuted, often murdered or driven off the land which is rightfully theirs, by these imposters who fallaciously claim a country which does not belong to them. In a newspaper article written by Leo Heiman, an unnamed senior Israeli government official was quoted concerning Arab sentiments toward the Jews:

The Arabs claim most European Jews have no right to be in [the State of] Israel in the first place because they are not descended from Biblical Hebrews, but from Tartar-Mongol nomad tribes, including the Khozars who were converted to Judaism en masse 1,000 years ago.78

Dr. Alfred M. Lilienthal, in his book The Other Side of the Coin, exposed Zionism and the atrocities committed by Jews upon Arabs:

"And ye shall love the stranger, for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt, and as one of the citizens shall be unto you the stranger that sojourneth in your midst, ye shall love him as thysellf."

This Biblical command from the Book of Leviticus has been ignored by the Israeli [Jewish] government. If the Arabs, who are themselves almost pure Semites, can be accused of anti-Semitism because of their intense and unrelenting opposition to Zionism and to [the State of] Israel, the shoe of bigotry fits much more appropriately on the Israeli foot. The 180,000 Arabs who remained and did not flee the new state upon its establishment in 1948 and the 700,000 Jewish Arabs who emigrated to [the State of] Israel from Yemen, Iraq, Egypt and the North African countries have, to use the popular parlance, been the victims of anti-Semitism ....79

Dr. Lilienthal then quoted another Jew, William Zukerman, who wrote the following in the October 16, 1961, Jewish Newsletter:

"[The Arabs have] been subjected to a series of discriminations and persecution [by the Jews] which would shock the civilized world, if they were fully known."80

Dr. Lilienthal then continued with his own comments:

While [the State of] Israel is almost universally regarded as the shining example of "democracy" in the Middle East, [the State of] Israel's 1952 Nationality Act codified discrimination into law and made the Arabs second class citizens. Under this legislation, all Jews in Israel automatically became citizens of the state, but not one of the more than 240,000 Arabs now in the country could gain citizenship without first proving that he had been a Palestinian citizen before May 14, 1948, and that he had lived in Israel continuously since the establishment of the state, or that he had re-entered Israel legally after its establishment.

To become a naturalized Israeli citizen, the Arab had to fulfill six requirements, including providing documentary proof of residence in Israel (for three of the five years preceding the application) and of knowledge of the Hebrew language. A Jew, from no matter where in the world, is exempt from these requirements. The Law of Return endowed him with the automatic and unqualified right to return to Israel for permanent settlement. Under this law, a Jew may become a citizen of [the State of] Israel after one minute in the land, a status that may be denied to an Arab although his forefathers have been there for a thousand years.81

While the world was supposed to understand perfectly the claim of Zionists that they were unable to forget Zion after nearly two thousand years, the Arabs were, after a few years, told to forget their homeland, which they and their forefathers had occupied for millennia. Arab refugees who had passed their entire life in Palestine were arrested, if not shot, as infiltrees, while Jewish immigrants who had lived thousands of miles away and might never have seen Palestine were welcomed as pioneering heroes.82

Should the Arabs be denounced for thinking and acting as if the Jews have been a curse to the Middle East? Ask the Jews, themselves:

Karl Marx, 1844, 1856

... the Jew likewise can only adopt a Jewish attitude, i.e., that of a foreigner.... He considers it his right to separate himself from the rest of humanity; as a matter of principle he takes no part in the historical movement and looks to a future which has nothing in common with the future of mankind as a whole....

On what grounds, then, do you Jews demand emancipation? On account of your religion? But it [Judaism] is the mortal enemy of the state religion [Christianity].83

What is the profane basis of Judaism? Practical need, self-interest. What is the worldly cult of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly god? Money....

We discern in Judaism, therefore, a universal antisocial element of the present time, whose historical development, zealously aided in its harmful aspects by the Jews....

In the final anaysis, the emancipation of the Jews is the emancipation of mankind from Judaisim.84

The social emancipation of the Jew is the emancipation of society from Judaism.85

We know that behind every tyrant stands a Jew, as a Jesuit stands behind every Pope. As the army of the Jesuits kills every free thought, so the desire of the oppressed would have chances of success, the usefulness of wars incited by capitalists would cease, if it were not for the Jews who steal the treasures of mankind. It is no wonder that 1856 years ago Jesus chased the userers from the Temple. They were like the contemporary userers who stand behind tyrants and tyrannies. The ... Jews have become so strong as to endanger the life of the whole world...86

Baruch Levy, mid 1800s

The Jewish people as a whole will be its own Messiah. It [the Jews] will attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy, and the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere excercise the privilege of citizenship. In the new world order the Children of Israel [the Jews misnamed] will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The Governments of the different peoples forming the world repulic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property, and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus the promise of the Talmud will be fulfilled, in which it is said that when the Messianic time is come, the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in thier hands.87

Benjamin Disraeli, 1858

They, [the Jews] are not the only people who are usurers, gladiators, and followers of man and scandalous occupations, nor are they anywhere a majority of such, but considering their general numbers, they contribute perhaps more than their proportion to the aggregate of the vile.88

Rabbi Reichhorn, 1869

The nations will gather to pay homage to the people of God [an illegitimate claim of the Jews]: all the fortunes of the nations will pass to the Jewish people; they will march captive behind the Jewish people in chains and will prostrate themselves before them; their kings will bring up their sons, and their princesses will nurse their children. The Jews will command the nations; they will summon peoples whom they do not even know, and people who do not know them will hasten to them. The riches of the sea and the wealth of nations will come to the Jews of their own right. Any people or kingdom who will not serve Israel [the Jews] will be destroyed....89

Professor Goldwin Smith, 1881

We [Jews] regard our race as superior to humanity, and look forward not to its ultimate union with other races, but to its triumph over them.90

Learned Elders of Zion, 1897

... the weapons in our [Jewish] hands are limitless ambitions, burning greediness, merciless vengeance, hatreds and malice.91

Theodor Herzl (Binyamin Ye’ev), circa 1900

If our work [Zionism] miscarries, hundreds of thousands of our [Jewish] supporters will at a single bound join the revolutionary parties.92

Bernard Lazare, 1903

... this [Jewish] race has been the object of hatred with all the nations amidst whom it ever settled. Inasmuch as the enemies of the Jews belonged to divers races; as they dwelled far apart from one another, were ruled by different laws and governed by opposite principles; as they had not the same customs and differed in spirit from one another, so that they [the Jews' enemies] could not possibly judge alike of any subject, it must needs be that the general causes of antisemitism [actually anti-Judaism] have always resided in Israel itself [the Jews themselves], and not in those [non-Jews] who antagonized it [the Jews].

... the Jews were themselves, in part, at least, the cause of their own ills....

Which virtues or which vices have earned for the Jew this universal enmity? Why was he ill-treated and hated alike and in turn by the Alexandrians and the Romans, by the Persians and the Arabs, by the Turks and the Christian nations? Because, everywhere up to our own days the Jew was an unsociable being.93

... the Jew was the proximate cause of usury; by the heavy interest he charged he caused destitution, severe and hard misery; accordingly, it was upon the Jews that enmities fell.94

... since it [the Jewish people] had become a deicide [destroyer of God], it had become the fallen people par excellence, and having before brought the world's salvation, it now causes its ruin.95

Kurt Munzer, 1907

We Jews have spoiled the blood of the races, we have tarnished and broken their power, we have made everything foul, rotten, decomposed and decayed.96

Israel Cohen, 1912,1914

We must realize that our [Jewish] party's most powerful weapon is racial tension. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by the whites we can mould them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our [Jewish] cause.97

It is natural that the Jews in Germany [and everywhere else] should throw in their lot with the Radical and Socialist parties....98

... the Jew has acquired the [misleading] reputation of being the personification of the commercial spirit, he [the Jew] is sometimes quite shiftless and helpless, failing miserably in everything he undertakes as though pursued by some mocking sprite [ghost] ....99

Dr. Oscar Ludwing Levy, 1920

We who have posed as Saviours of the World ... we [Jews] are today nothing else but the world's seducers, its destroyers, its incendiaries, its executioners.... We who have promised to lead you to a new heaven, we have finally succeeded in landing you into a new hell.100

Svetozar Tonjoroff, 1920

What Jewish idealism and Jewish discontent have so powerfully contributed to accomplish [by establishing Communism] in Russia, the same historic qualities of the Jewish mind and heart are tending to promote in other countries.101

Maurice Samuel, 1924

... our existence is secured at an infinite expense of special effort on our part, and of peculiar discomfort to you. Wherever the Jew is found he is a problem, a source of unhappiness to himself and those around him.102

The dislike of your modern world for the modern Jew is as relevant as the dislike of your old world for the orthodox Jew.103

We Jews are accused of being destroyers: whatever you put up, we [Jews] tear down. ... We are not iconoclasts [attackers of established beliefs or institutions] deliberately: we are not enemies of your institutions simply because of the dislike between us. We are a homeless mass seeking satisfaction for our constructive instincts. And in your institutions we cannot find satisfaction; they are the play institutions of the splendid children of man - and not of man himself. We try to adapt your institutions to our needs, because while we live we must have expression; and trying to rebuild them for our needs, we unbuild them for yours.

...your chief institution is the social structure ... it is in this that we [Jews] are most manifestly destroyers.104

We Jews, we, the destroyers, will remain the destroyers forever. Nothing that you will do will meet our needs and demands. We will forever destroy because we need a world of our own....105

Our [Jewish] geniuses, in the midst of your world, are an alien and destructive element....They are our spokesmen; or, better said, ourselves in utterance.106

Samuel Roth, 1925,1934

Why, I want to know, have we Jews appointed ourselves the peacemakers of the world? Why have we relegated to ourselves the stupid and ungrateful task of going about crying out for peace among the nations? We [Jews] are not even ourselves a peaceful people, for we harbor, perhaps, more dissension in Israel [Israeli-held Palestine] than is to be found among all the rest of the nations on earth combined.107

We come to the nations pretending to escape persecution, we [Jews] the most deadly persecutors in all the wretched annals of man.108

... I remember ... Franz Oppenheimer's brilliant theory concerning the formation of states. In the beginning, he argues, there are two kinds of communities from which the state is evolved: the peaceful, uncharted [non-Jewish] tillers of the soil who may be compared collectively to the passive female organ; and the [Jewish] bands of wandering marauders whose only means of living is to fall on one or more of these peaceful settlements, enslave them and commercialize their talents and labors. This second type of community he compared to the male. When these two meet, and one penetrates the other, the theory goes on, conception takes place, and there is a blessed event - the birth of a new state. The Jewish nation certainly constitutes ... the male organ. The organ is constantly at work and may be depended on for services in and out of time. But there is a grave difficulty. The organ is diseased. The disease is a sort of moral gonorrhea known as Judaism, and seems to be, alas, incurable. The results of such mating, as any good doctor will tell you, are invariably treacherous and unhealthy. If you are in doubt, take a look at any Jew ridden country in Europe. If you need be further connived, take a look at what's happening in America.109

...it has become an old Jewish habit to [falsely] assume that the Jew has culturally enriched every country he has favored with his presence and patronage.

...I cannot find anything of value that they [the Jews] have themselves created in their two hundred and fifty years on the American continent.110

It is my honest belief that nothing the Jew does in America is essential to its welfare. On the contrary, a great deal of what the American Jew does is subversive of America's best interest....the Jew in America is forever engaged in the fascinating pursuit of creating everything he needs out of nothing...111

Professor Ferdynand Antoni Ossendowski, 1926

Is it surprising, therefor, that Judaism should become the fermenting and destructive element in countries which have always despised and persecuted it? That particular facility for intrigue stratagem, conspiracies, and that patient, almost uncanny waiting for the hour of never-filing revenge, are characteristics ...of the "chosen people [the Jews misidentified].112

Rene Groos, 1927

The two Internationales of Finance and Revolution....are the two fronts of the Jewish Internationale. There is Jewish conspiracy against all [non-Jewish] nations.113

Marcus Eli Ravage, 1928

You have not begun to appreciate the real depth of our guilt. We [Jews] are intruders. We are disturbers. We are subverters. We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and played havoc with them. We have been at the bottom not merely of the latest great war but of nearly all your wars, not only of the Russian but of every other major revolution in your history. We have brought discord and confusion and frustration into your personal and public life. We are still doing it. No one can tell how long we shall go on doing it.114

Dr. B. Messinsohn, 1930

I warn the world, that if it does not keep the faith with us, there are 16-million Jews who will be filled again with the hatred which has released so many great destructions against the Christian world.115

Vladimir Jabotinski, 1931

Jews might become the dynamite which will blow up the British Empire.116

Bernard Joseph Brown, 1933

Through the intervention of the A.D.L. [Anti-Defamation League] we [Jews] have succeeded in muzzling the non-Jewish press to the extent that newspapers in America abstain from pointing out that any person unfavourably referred to is a Jew.117

Of course we [Jews] must be feared and eventually hated if we persist in absorbing everything America offers us and yet refuse to become Americans just as we have always refused to become Russians or Poles.118

Michael Gold (Irwin Granich), 1935

How do you account for the fact that so many young Jews may be found in the radical movements of all the lands?

As for the rich Jews, the exploiting Jews.... Many of them helped [Adolph] Hitler in Germany with funds and advice, and still are at ease in their Nazi capitalist Zion.119

Harry Waton, 1939

The communists are Marxists, bolshevists, internationalists, Jews, enemies of the Aryans [Celto-Saxons] and their culture; Soviet Russia is ruled by Jews and barbarians that are incapable of culture. Are not these good reasons why the German people, the chosen people, the highest cultured people of the highest Aryan race ... are entitled to Ukraina?120

This was the mortal dread of the anti-Semites. It was the dread that is felt by one who faces the yawning mouth of the serpent who is about to swallow him. Judaism appeared to the anti-Semites [a mis-appellation applied to non-Jewish Celto-Saxons] as a serpent that is about to swallow them. It was not only the dread of death but worse still, it was the dread of being swallowed by the serpent Judaism [Matt. 23:29-33] and being turned into Jews.121

... Judaism is the highest world philosophy [according to the Jews] which roots deep in the blood of the Jewish people. A world philosophy, just because it is a world philosophy, endeavors to become the only philosophy in the world, and therefore cannot tolerate any other world philosophy.122

The supreme mission of the Aryans [Celto-Saxons], and especially of the German people, is to annihilate the Jews and Judaism [according to Harry Waton]. When the Aryans will have annihilated the Jews and Judaism, then this earth will be purged of all sins and corruption, and the Aryan race will attain to its highest development.123

The bloods of these races [Aryans and Jews] cannot mix, without corrupting the blood of the Aryan race; and the cultures of these races cannot mix, without corrupting the Aryan culture. Hence it becomes the supreme historic duty of the Aryans, and especially of the Germans, not to mix their blood and their culture with the blood and the culture of the Jews.... That the Aryans, and especially the Germans may realize their destiny, the Jews and their culture [religion] must be destroyed. Now, this theory ... was ridiculed as being false and irrational.... We shall presently see that this theory rests on a truth ....124

... the tents of Shem [Jews - more precisely the tents of Japheth] are communism, internationalism, democracy, the equality of the races, nations and peoples, the universal brotherhood of man....

Two of the great sins of Judaism and the Jews are communism and internationalism.... And it is to the greatest credit of Judaism and the Jews that they are identified with communism and internationalism.125

... we see that these two cardinal sins of Judaism, namely: communism and internationalism, are in truth and in fact great virtues. Judaism may be justly proud of these virtues....

The most heinous crime of Judaism and the Jews is Marxism.126

Since the Jews are the highest and most cultured people on earth [according to Harry Waton], the Jews have a right to subordinate to themselves the rest of mankind and to be the masters over the whole earth. Now, indeed, this is the historic destiny of the Jews....127

Berl Locker, 1943

They [the Jews] had the right to come to the world today and say, "Here is the Jewish problem which you [non Jews] must solve. Otherwise there won't be rest in the world."128

Rabbi Eliezer Berkovits, 1945

Whatever good we [Jews] have tried to do we have done half-heartedly .... We wished for peace, but did next to nothing to secure it.

... if we think of our own Jewish affairs, it cannot be doubted that all our Jewishness bore the stamp of half-heartedness. Whether the issues were national, communal or religious ... we [Jews] have bungled everything, all our efforts have been covered with the pale cast of unhealthy compromise.129

Our [the Jews'] enemies know why they hate us and they have every reason for their hatred.130

Dr. Benjamin H. Freedman, 1948

... America and American Christianity stand at a crossroad. The majority must decide whether it will longer submit to being the tool of [the Zionist Jews] a small but ruthless and unscrupulous minority of a minority people.131

Chaim Weizmann, 1949

Whenever the quantity of Jews in any country reaches the saturation point, that country reacts against them.... England had reached the point where she could or would absorb so many Jews and no more.... The reaction against this cannot be looked upon as anti-semitism in the ordinary or vulgar sense of that word; it is a universal social and economic concomitant [accompaniment] of Jewish immigration and we cannot shake it off. Sir William [Evans Gordon, a British official] had no particular anti-Jewish prejudice. He acted ... in the most kindly way, in the interests of his country.

Certain countries can digest a certain number of Jews; once that number has been passed, something drastic must happen; the Jews must go.132

James Paul Warburg, 1950

We [Jews] shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest.133

Professor Seymour Martin Lipset, 1961

To the extent that there are new or old, young or adult, radical movements remaining in America, these are again disproportionately Jewish in composition.134

James Yaffe, 1968

It's almost as if some symbiotic relationship now exists between the Jews and the Germans. We can never break loose from them; we're [Jews are] doomed to go through the ages together, tied to them [the Germans] by our [Jewish] hatred.135

... Jewish theater and film producers have created the wholly mythological figure of the gentle, inoffensive, philosophical, shoulder-shrugging Jew, ready to give the hero the benefit of his wise warmhearted advice. [Film critic] Pauline Kael detects him in the kindly old pharmacist in West Side Story, and points out that his chief function is to convince the gentile [non-Jewish] world how harmless the Jew is.136

In the last hundred years [and since] Jews have been deeply involved with all the radical movements, from socialism to anarchism to communism...

... Jewish radicals aren't quite like non-Jewish ones. In spite of themselves their Jewishness permeates their thoughts and feelings. It even gives a special cast to their radicalism.

In the early years of the century most of them [the Jewish radicals] rejected Judaism.... But while they rejected the religion, they never actually left the Jewish community.

On the contrary, they [the Jewish radicals] became the leaders of the community.137

[The accusation of] Anti-Semitism, in short was the issue [pretense] that enabled the Jewish radical to be a part of the total Jewish community. As long as radicalism could be equated with the fight against [the alleged] anti-Semitism [of non-Jews], the Jewish radical was able to reject his religion without rejecting his people. He was even able to put his radicalism on a specifically Jewish basis.... "You can't be Jewish without being radical" was the old Workmen's Circle philosophy.138

The nonpopulist brand of radicalism is noisy, intellectual, ideological, and primarily Jewish.139

Elie Wiesel, 1968

Every Jew, somewhere in his being, should set apart a zone of hate - healthy, virile hate - for what the German personifies and for what persists in the German.140

Aaron Zelman, 1990

The most vocal of liberal Jewish anti-gunners do indeed understand why they want Americans disarmed, as it is a crucial step for total control of peoples' lives and destiny, which is the ultimate goal of the liberal [Jewish] political agenda.141

Not only is it admitted by the Jews that they have been a curse rather than a blessing, but Jews also acknowledge that they have contributed little to society in the way of science, art and literature:

In a hundred years of modernity, we [Jews], an able race, have given little more than mediocrity to your [Celto-Saxon] way of life.... In the arts we have been second-rate, third-rate. ...in science, belles-lettres [literature] and the plastic arts [we Jews have] been a thoroughly minor people....

The astonishing thing is that this took place despite desperate conscious efforts on our part to become like you [Celto-Saxons].142

...in art and science... we [Jews] have shown no special aptitude....143

We [Jews] are unimaginative, as old people are unimaginative in the presence of young people. We neither play with emotions nor with things; we lack romanticists as we lack inventors - because we lack inventiveness.144

We [Jews] lack inventiveness, You will say that this springs from our lack of vitality. Men are lyrical because life sings in them; they are inventive because life is restless in them and drives their fingers to activity. I will not argue the cause of the difference, but, lacking inventiveness, we also lack sympathy for it.145

Your [Celto-Saxon] world spins in a joyous illusion of progress; we [Jews], untouched by that illusion, destructive of your mood, stand aside, static....

And as long as they [the Jews] retain their Jewish identity, they will, despite denial and effort to the contrary, remain the same.146

All of the witnesses quoted in this chapter, non-Jewish and Jewish alike, are simply testifying to the fulfillment of Isaiah's prophecy:

... you will leave your name for a curse to My chosen ones.... But My servants will be called by another name. (Isaiah 65:15)

The "you" that the Prophet Isaiah was referring to are Judahites, as Isaiah's primary focus and mission was the house of Judah. The "chosen ones" are Israelites, specifically the remnant from both houses of Israel who would be saved in Yeshua the Christ. Isaiah further identifies these "chosen ones" as "servants" who would be "called by another name" - Christians. Consequently, Isaiah was warning that the Judahites would leave their name as a curse to the remnant of Israel who would become Christians. How has this been accomplished? The name "Jew" evolved from the name "Judahite;" the Khazar "Jews," who deceitfully use that name and claim to be Israelites, testify themselves that they are indeed a curse to true Israel as well as the rest of the world.

Many Judeo-Christian preachers today are telling their flocks that Christians in America should religiously, politically and financially support the counterfeit Israeli-Jews who are plundering and pillaging the Arabs and robbing them of their land in the Middle East. By misapplying the promise that God gave to Abraham and his descendants in Genesis 12, these preachers insist that we are obligated to support and love the Jews, or else we will be cursed as a consequence. However, ask yourself: "Since 1948, when the Jews appropriated the land of Palestine as their homeland and when Americans began blessing them with massive financial and military assistance, has America prospered or declined?"

If we assume that the Jews are the true Israelites, then based on God's Word, we must expect God to bless America for aiding and abetting the Jews. Instead, we find quite the opposite. Rather than being blessed, America is being cursed! Since 1948, America has been on the decline morally, spiritually, physically, financially and politically. Why? Because America's Zionist Jews and Judeo-Christian preachers have misidentified the modern-day Israeli imposters as Israelites. The Jews have been and continue to be a curse to the rest of the world; whereas the Celto-Saxons, for the most part, have been and continue to be a blessing to the rest of the world.

Jewish author Yair Davidy not only identified the Celto-Saxons as Israelites, but also testified to their beneficence:

The nations identified in this book [The Tribes] as being of the Israelite-seed of Abraham were those who mainly conducted European [Celto-Saxon] colonialist policies from the eighteenth to twentieth centuries. The overall effects of colonialism, in most cases, were very beneficial ... colonialism put a stop to internicene warfare, ended human sacrifice and slavery, founded and/or improved irrigation systems, reformed agricultural practices and public hygiene, built bridges, roads, public works, and so on. Wherever they [Celto-Saxons] ruled the local population greatly increased in numbers, in health, and in respect for basic human dignity.147

The following national aspects of Israel have thus far been examined:

Israel was to continue as a nation before YHWH forever.

Israel was to become a great and mighty nation.

Israel was to become a vast multitude of people. Israel was to become a multitude of nations.

Israel was to rule over other nations.

Israel was to be feared by all nations.

Israel was to be a blessing to all nations of the earth.

The Celto-Saxons are the only people who fulfill all of these aspects and marks of true Israel.

End Notes

1. Lieutenant Colonel Charles Hamilton Smith The Natural History of the Human Species (New York, NY: Gould & Lincoln, 1851) p. 361.

2. Smith, p. 229.

3. Samuel Kneeland, Jr., M.D., Introduction to The Natural History of the Human Species by Lieutenant Colonel Charles Hamilton Smith (New York, NY: Gould & Lincoln, 1851) pp. 15-16.

4. Kneeland, p. 7.

5. Kneeland, pp. 94-95.

6. Kneeland, p. 96.

7. Henry Woldmar Ruoff, “Book of Races and Peoples,” The Circle of Knowledge (Boston, MA: The Standard Publication Company, 1916) p. 277.

8. Arnold Joseph Toynbee, A Study in History (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1934) vol. 1, p. 216.

9. Toynbee, vol. 1, p. 232.

10. Toynbee, vol. 8, p. 310.

11. Victor Duruy, A History of the World, 1898 ed. reprint (Cleveland, OH: The World Syndicate Publishing Company, 1937), vol. 3, p. 5. Victor Duruy was former Minister of Public Instruction in France. A History of the World was revised and continued to 1901 by Edwin Augustus Grosvenor, former Professor of Modern Government and International Law at Amherst College (Amherst, MA), with supplementary chapters to the 1925 edition by Mabell Shippie Clarke Smith and Joseph Walker McSpadden, edited and revised to 1937 by Clement Wood.

12. Count Joseph-Arthur de Gobineau, The Moral & Intellectual Diversity of Races (Philadelphia, PA: J.B. Lippincott & Company, 1856) p. 176

13. de Gobineau, pp. 252-253.

14. de Gobineau, p. 456.

15. H. Hotz, Analytical Introduction, Count Joseph-Arthur de Bobineau, The Moral and Intellectual Diversity of Races (Philadelphia, PA: J.B. Lippincott & Company, 1856), pp. 32-33

16. Hotz, p. 62.

17. James Henry Breasted, The Conquest of Civilization, 1916 ed. reprint (New York, NY: Harper & Brothers Publishers, 1926) p. 112.

18. Breasted, p. 113.

19. Breasted, pp. 114-115.

20. Pastor Ezra Stiles, D.D., “The United States Elevated to Glory and Honor,” elected sermon in 1783, quoted in John Wingate Thornton, The Pulpit of the American Revolution: Political Sermons of the Period of 1776, 1860 ed. reprint (Boston, MA: Da Capo Press, 1970) pp. 469-470.

21. Pastor Josiah Strong, D.D., Our Country: Its Possible Future and Its Current Crisis (New York, NY: Baker & Taylor Company for the American Home Missionary Society, 1885), pp. 160-161.

22. Daniel Webster, address at the U.S. House of Representatives, 19 January 1824, The Works of Daniel Webster (Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company, 1858), vol. 8, p. 74.

23. Alexis de Tocqueville, Henry Reeve, trans., Democracy in America (New York, NY: The Colonial Press, 1899), vol. 1, p. 400.

24. de Tocqueville, vol. 1, p. 430.

25. de Tocqueville, vol. 1, p. 434.

26. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Warning to the West (New York, NY: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 1975) p. 27.

27. Wilmot Robertson, The Dispossessed Majority (Cape Canaveral, FL: Howard Allen Enterprises, 1972), p. 531.

28. Thomas Jefferson, Albert Ellery Bergh, ed., The Writings of Thomas Jefferson (Washington, DC: The Thomas Jefferson Memorial Association of the United States, 1907), p. 21.

29. Daniel Webster, address for the completion of the Bunker Hill Monument, The Works of Daniel Webster (Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Company, 1858) vol. 1, pp. 104-105.

30. Emperor Tiberius Claudius Nero Caesar, F.R. Walton, trans., Tiberius, Diodorus Siculus, vol. 11, p. 53, quoted in Wilmot Robertson, The Dispossessed Majority (Cape Canaveral, FL: Howard Allen Enterprises, 1972), p. 153.

31. Matthew 3:7b.

32. Matthew 12:34a.

33. Matthew 15:7-9

34. Matthew 15:14.

35. Matthew 16:6.

36. Matthew 23:2-7.

37. Matthew 23:13-19.

38. Matthew 23:23-30.

39. Matthew 23:33-35.

40. John 8:44.

41. Revelation 2:9.

42. Revelation 3:9.

43. Justin Martyr, Arthur Lukyn Williams, trans., Justin Martyr, the Dialogue With Trypho (New York, NY: Macmillan Company, 1930) p. 32.

44. Justin, pp. 33-34.

45. Justin, pp. 34-35.

46. Justin, p. 198.

47. Justin, p. 202.

48. Archbishop John Chrysostom, quoted in Bernard Lazare, Antisemitism: Its History and Causes (New York, NY: The International Library Publishing Company, 1903) pp. 68-69.

49. Jerome (Eusebius Sophronius Hieronymous), quoted in Bernard Lazare, Antisemtisim: Its History and Causes (New York, NY: The International Library Publishing Company, 1903), p. 68. Bernard Lazare documents the names of many others who also either spoke or wrote about the “curse of the Jews.” Lazare, pp. 71-72: “In this the [Church] Fathers followed a secular tradition; upon the battleground they are unanimous, and there are legions of theologians, historians and writers who think and write of the Jews the same as [Archbishop John] Chrysostom: [Bishop] Epiphanius, [Bishop] Diodurus of Tarsus, [Bishop] Theodore of Mopsuestia, [Bishop] Theodoret of Cyprus [Cyrrhus], [Monk] Cosmas Indicopleustes, [Bishop] Athanasius of Sinait, [Bishop] Synesius, among the Greeks, [Bishop] Hilarius [Hillary] of Poitiers [France], [Hymnist Aurelius Clemens] Prudentius, [Historian] Paulus Orosius, [Historian] Sulpicius Severus, [Monk] Gennadius, [Bishop] Benantius [Honorius Clementianus] Fortunatus, [Archbishop] Isidore [Isidorus Hispalensis] of Seville [Spain], among the Latins.” Lazare, pp. 163-166: “…anti-Judaism was not religious only, but social as well. …[Archbishop] Agobard, Amolong, [Monk] Rigord, [Abbot] Pierre [Maurice de Montboissier] de Cluny [Peter the Venerable], Simon Maiol were these anti-Jews…. To this picture of the perfidia Judaeorum [treacherous Jews], the anti-Judaism became purely polemic [aggressive refutation of errors]. The theological and social considerations now occupy but a limited place in the books of Alonzo da Spina, especially Pierre de Lancre and Francisco de Torrejonicillo. The Sentinel Against the Jews, a pamphlet by the last named, is particularly curious. Written in Spain at the beginning of the seventeenth century, it was aimed at the Marranos, who, it was said, invaded all the civil and religious offices. It consisted of fourteen books and showed that the Jews were presumptuous and liars, that they were turbulent, self-conceited, seditious….” Jerome (340-420) wrote the Latin Vulgate Translation of the Old and New Testaments and the Apocrypha from the original Hebrew and Greek.

50. Pope Gelasius I, quoted in Edward A. Synan, The Popes and the Jews in the Middle Ages (New York, NY: Macmillan Company, 1965) p. 32.

51. Mohammed, quoted in Quotes Without Comments (Reedy, WV: Liberty Bell Publications) pp. 2-3.

52. Seventeenth Council of Toldeo, Spain, quoted in Edward A. Synan, The Popes and the Jews in the Middle Ages (New York, NY: Macmillan Company, 1965) p. 52.

53. Pope Gregory VII (Hildebrand), quoted in Abram Leon Sachar, A History of the Jews (New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf, 1968) p. 187.

54. Peter the Venerable (Pierre Maurice de Montboissier), Abbot of Cluny, quoted in Edward A. Synan, The Popes and the Jews in the Middle Ages (New York, NY: Macmillan Company, 1965) p. 76.

55.Geoffrey Chaucer, “The Prioress’s Tale,” Canterbury Tales, 1387, reprint. ed. (Garden City, NY: Garden City Books, 1934) p. 179.

56. Martin Luther, The Jews and Their Lies, quoted in Quotes Without Comments (Reedy, WV: Liberty Bell Publications) p. 17.

57. Luther, p. 28.

58. Pope Clement VIII, quoted in Quotes Without Comments (Reedy, WV: Liberty Bell Publications) pp. 1-2.

59. Voltaire (Jean Francois Marie Arouet), quoted in Quotes Without Comments (Reedy, WV: Liberty Bell Publications) p. 3.

60. Voltaire (Jean Francois Marie Arouet), H.I. Woolf, trans., Voltaire’s Philosophical Dictionary (New York, NY: Carlton House, 1930), p. 224.

61. Pastor Cotton Mather, D.D., Magnalia Christi Americana; or The Ecclesiastical History of New-England, 1702, reprint. ed. (New York, NY: Russell & Russell, 1967) vol. 1, pp. 204-05.

62. Pastor Isaac Watts, quoted in John Hoyles, The Waning of the Renaissance 1640-1740 (The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1971) p. 243.

63. George Washingston, John Frederick Schroeder, comp., Maxims of Washington (New York, NY: D. Appleton and Company, 1894) p. 126. In a letter to Judge Julian William Mack (U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals) dated July 14, 1933, Rabbi Stephen Samuel Wise quoted the U.S. Ambassador to Germany, William Edward Dodd. Both Ambassador Dodd and Rabbi Wise imply anti-Jewish sentiments to both George Washington and Thomas Jefferson: “The only disturbing note of the week was his [Ambassador Dodd’s] statement in the dealing, as he did at some length, with the problems of American history: ‘One cannot write the whole truth about Jefferson and Washington – people are not ready and must be prepared for it.’” Stephen S. Wise: Servant of the People, Selected Letters, edited by Carl Hermann Voss (Philadelphia, PA: The Jewish Publication Society of Amerian, 1969) p. 191.

64. Benjamin Franklin quoted from “Chit, Chat Around the Table During Intermission” in the diary of Charles Cotesworth Pinckney (1746-1825), one of the framers of the Constitution of the United States from South Carolina. “Unfortunately, no copies of the Pinckney diary are known to exist at the present time. After publication of the Franklin prophecy in the 1930s, the only known copy at the Franklin Museum in Philadelphia mysteriously disappeared and all references to it were withdrawn. The Jews immediately seized upon this as proof that the Franklin prophecy is a ‘forgery,’ and they marshaled a cast of kept academicians to denounce it. However, the Jewish assertions can be rejected on several counts: Pinckney himself referred to his diary – which the Jews claim never existed – in a letter to John Quincy Adams dated December 30, 1818…. Eyewitnesses of unimpeachable integrity in sworn affidavits have reported seeing the Pinckney diary at the Franklin Museum in Philadelphia earlier in the century before its mysterious disappearance down some Orwellian Memory Hole… But perhaps the best proof of the Franklin prophecy – as with any prophecy – lies in its actual fulfillment. What Benjamin Franklin foresaw as an ominous possibility in 1787 has today – less than 200 years later – become painful reality.” The Liberty Bell, March 1976.

65. Napoleon Bonaparte, quoted in Quotes Without Comments, (Reedy, WV: Liberty Bell Publications) p. 3.

66. Thomas Jefferson, letter to Benjamin Rush in 1803, quoted in Michael Ledeen in “Should Jews Fear the Christian Right,” Moment: The Magazine of Jewish Culture and Opinion, October 1994, p. 47.

67. Johann Gottlieb Fichte, quoted in Abram Leon Sachar, A History of the Jews (New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf, 1968), p. 276.

68. Andrew Jackson, quoted in Charles Edward Coughlin, Money! Questions and Answers (Royal Oak, MI: The National Union for Social Justice, 1936), p. 168.

69. Heinrich von Treitschke, quoted in Abram Leon Sachar, A History of the Jews (New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf, 1968) p. 341.

70. Sir Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill, quoted in Illustrated Sunday Herald (London, UK) 8 Feburary 1920, p. 5, reproduced in part in “Some Indirect Copliments,” in B’nai B’rith News (Chicago, IL) May 1920. “The Secretary of War [Mr. Churchill] charges Jews with originating the gospel of Antichrist and when engineering a ‘world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization’….” Jewish Chronicle (London, UK) 13 February 1928. British statesman Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965) was the Prime Minister of Great Britain 1940-1945, 1951-1955.

71. Henry Ford, Sr., and The Dearborn Independent, The International Jew: The World’s Foremost Problem (Dearborn, MI: The Dearborn Publishing Company, 1922), p. 43, reprinted from a series of articles appearing originally in The Dearborn Independent, 22 May 1920 – 2 October 1920.

72. For documentation regarding the Jews’ influence in the media refer to Beware of the Leaven of the Pharisees and Who Rules America.

73. Ford, pp. 163-164.

74. “The Jews as Outcasts,” The Jewish Almanac, compiled and edited by Richard Siegel and Carl Rheins (New York, NY: Bantam Books, 1980) p. 127.

75. Robert Bailey Thomas, The Farmer’s Almanac (Boston, MA: The Apollo Press, Belknap and Hall, 1793).

76. Samuel Roth, Now and Forever (New York, NY: Robert M. McBride & Company, 1925) pp. 54-55.

77. Samuel Roth, Jews Must Live (New York, NY: The Golden Hind Press, Inc., 1934) pp. 64-65.

78. Remarks of a senior Israeli government official, quoted in Leo Heiman, “The Jews That Maybe Aren’t,” San Diego Union, August 1966, p. 28.

79. Dr. Alfred M. Lilienthal, The Other Side of the Coin (New York, NY: The Devin-Adair Company, 1965) p. 212.

80. Lilienthal, p. 212.

81. Lilienthal, p. 212-213.

82. Lilienthal, pp. 241-242.

83. Heinrich Karl Marx, T.B. Bottomore, trans., Karl Marx: Early Writings (New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1963) p. 4.

84. Marx, p. 34.

85. Marx, p. 40.

86. Heinrich Karl Marx, “The Russian Loan,” New York Tribune, 1856, quoted in Richard Wurmbrand, Marx & Satan (Westchest, IL: Crossway Books, Good News Publishers, 1986) p. 41.

87. Baruch Levy, letter written to Heinrich Karl Marx, quoted in Revue de Paris, 1 June 1928, p. 574.

88. Benjamin Disraeli, Lord George Bentinck: A Political Biography (London, UK: Archibald Constable and Company, 1905) p. 319. Benjamin Disraeli (1804-1881) was the first and only Jew to be the Prime Minister of England in 1868 and also from 1874 to 1880. Disraeli was “raised” as a Christian by his Jewish father.

89. Rabbi Reichorn, “Funeral Oration for Grand Rabbi Simeon-ben-Ihuda,” published in Vielle France, 10 March 1921, and in Libre Parole, 27 November 1933, quoted in The Liberty Bell, 29 March 1983, p. 29.

90. Professor Goldwin Smith, quoted in Colonel Jack Mohr, From the Horse’s Mouth (Bay Saint Louis, MS). Goldwin Smith was professor of Modern History at England’s Oxford University in 1881. He later taught History at Wayne State University in Detroit, MI.

91. Protocol 9, Article 3, Sentence 4, Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Victor Emile Marsden, trans., 1905, reprint. ed. (Boring, OR: CPA Books) p. 28. According to translator Victor Emile Marsden, the “Protocols” give the substance of addresses delivered at the First Zionist Congress held in Basel, Switzerland, in 1897 under its president and the father of modern Jewish Zionism, the late Theodor Herzl (Binyamin Ye’ev). They reveal the plan of action for Talmudic Zionism’s quest for world domination. Sergiei Aleksandrovich Nilus wrote the “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” as an appendix to his book Velikov v Malom – The Great in the Little, or The Coming of Anti-Christ and the Rule of Satan on Earth, which was translated from Russian by Mr. Marsden and published in Tarskoe Selo (Pushkin), Russia, by Tip. Tsarkoselskago Komiteta Krasnago Krest in 1905; republished in London, England, by The Britons in 1920 as The Jewish Peril: The Protocols of the Learned of Zion, and republished many times under various titles. An original copy of Mr. Nilus’ book containing the “Protocols” is in the British Museum bearing the reception date of August 10, 1906.

92. Theodor Herzl (Binyamin Ye’ev), quoted by Dougles Reed in The Controversy of Zion (Durban, Natal, South Africa: Dolphin Press (Pty) Limited, 1978) p. 203.

93. Bernard Lazare, Antisemitism: Its History and Causes (New York, NY: The International Library Publishing Company, 1903) pp. 8-9.

94. Lazare, p. 111.

95. Lazare, p. 212.

96. Kurt Munzer, Der Weg Nach Zion: Ein Roman –The Way to Zion: A Novel (Stuttgart, Germany: A. Juncker, 1907) quoted in National Christian News, 1972, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 4.

97. Israel Cohen, A Racial Program for the 20th Century (1912), quoted by U.S. Congressman Thomas Gerstle Abernethy (D-MS) in Congressional Record (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1957) p. 8559.

98. Israel Coehn, Jewish Life in Modern Times (New York, NY: Dodd, Mead and Company, 1914) pp. 168-169.

99. Cohen, p. 186.

100. Dr. Oscar Ludwig Levy, Preface, George Henry Lane Fox Pitt-Rivers, The World Significance of the Russian Revolution (Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell, 1920) p. x.

101. Svetozar Tonjoroff, The American Hebrew (New York, NY) 10 September 1920, p. 507.

102. Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles (New York, NY) 10 September 1920, p.

103. Samuel, p. 143.

104. Samuel, pp. 146-147.

105. Samuel, p. 155.

106. Samuel, p. 184.

107. Samuel Roth, Now and Forever (New York, NY: Robert M. McBride & Company, 1925) p. 54.

108. Samuel Roth, Jews Must Live (New York, NY: The Golden Hind Press, Inc., 1934) p. 65.

109. Roth, p. 66.

110. Roth, p. 101.

111. Roth, p. 111.

112. Professor Ferdynand Antoni Ossendowski, The Nineteenth Century and After (London, UK: Constable & Company Limited, 1926) p., 29.

113. Rene Groos, Le Nouveau Mercure (Paris, France) May 1927, quoted in Why Don’t You Believe What We Tell You? (Costa Mesa, CA: The Noontide Press) p. 16.

114. Marcus Eli Ravage, “A Real Case Against the Jews – One of Them Points Out the Full Depth of Their Guilt,” The Century Monthly Magazine, February 1928, p. 347.

115. Dr. B. Messinsohn, lecture in Cape Town, South Africa, on July 2, 1930, quoted in Cape Town Times, quoted in Col. Jack Mohr, From the Horse’s Mouth (Bay Saint Louis, MS).

116. Vladimir Jabotinski, Zionist leader’s remarks at the 5th Congress of the Polish Zionist Revisionists in Warsaw, Poland, quoted in The London Times, 30 December 1931.

117. Bernard Joseph Brown, From Pharaoh to Hitler, “What Is a Jew” (Chicago, IL: Consolidated Book Publishers, 1933), quoted in Douglas Reed, The Controversy of Zion (Durban, Natal, South Africa: Dolphin Press (Pty) Limited, 1978), p. 341.

118. Brown, p. 570.

119. Michael Gold (Irwin Granich), “The Gun Is Loaded, Dreiser!,” New Masses, 7 May 1935, p. 15.

120. Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York, NY: Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939) p. 36.

121. Waton, p. 53.

122. Waton, p. 57.

123. Waton, p. 58.

124. Waton, p. 65.

125. Waton, p. 74.

126. Waton, p. 80.

127. Waton, pp. 99-100.

128. Berl Locker, address at the Zionist Congress, quoted in Jewish Chronicle (London, UK) 22 January 1943.

129. Rabbi Eliezer Berkovits, Between Yesterday and Tomorrow, Sermons (Oxford, UK: The East and West Library, 1945) pp. 19-20.

130. Berkovits, p. 99.

131. Dr. Benjamin H. Freedman, “Economic Council Letter, No. 177 (October 15, 1947),” Palestine (New York, NY: National Economic Council, Inc., 1947), quoted in Destiny Magazine, 28 January 1948.

132. Chaim Weizmann, quoted in Douglas Reed, The Controversy of Zion (Durban, Natal, South Africa: Dolphin Press (Pty) Limited, 1978) pp. 312-313. Chaim Weizmann (1874-1952) was the first president of the State of Israel.

133. James Paul Warburg, testimony before the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, February 17, 1950, p. 494.

134. Professor Paul Warburg, testimony before the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, 17 February 1950, p. 494.

135. James Yaffe, The American Jews (New York, NY: Random House, 1968) p. 58.

136. Yaffe, p. 62.

137. Yaffe, p. 250.

138. Yaffe, p. 252.

139. Yaffe, p. 255. Ernest Van den Haag, an American anti-communist, confirmed Mr. Yaffe’s remarks: “Out of ten radicals, five are likely to be Jewish.” Quoted in Wilmot Robertson, The Dispossessed Majority (Cape Canaveral, FL: Howard Allen Enterprises, 1972) p. 331.

140. Elie Wiesel, Legends of Our Time (New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968) p. 142.

141. Aaron Zelman, “JPFO: In Defense of Firearms Ownership,” American Survival Guide, November 1989, vol. 11, no. 11, p. 51.

142. Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles (New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1924) p. 141.

143. Samuel, p. 142.

144. Samuel, p. 184.

145. Samuel, p. 185.

146. Samuel, p. 187.

147. Yair Davidy, The Tribes (Hebron, Israel: Russell-Davis Publishers, 1994) p. 15.

Chapter 5    Table of Contents    Chapter 7

Most Recent Article

An Open Response to Martin Selbrede and Archie Jones’ ‘Book Review’ of Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective

Most Recent Message

Important Books

Home | Site Map | Contact | Order Form

Mission to Israel · P.O. Box 248 · Scottsbluff, NE 69363 · Email